The Ultimate Growth Hormone Peptide Tier List
I get a lot of requests for tier list videos, and I finally got around to making one. This is my honest ranking of 13 growth hormone compounds based on what I've seen coaching thousands of people. Fair warning, some of these rankings might ruffle feathers. I welcome the feedback.
A quick note on how I'm grading
I'm rating these compounds against each other within the growth hormone class. If I give something an F, that doesn't mean it's worthless. It means there are way better options out there for the same goal.
Think of it like rating cars. A Hyundai is an F next to a Ferrari. But a Hyundai is an A+ next to a horse and buggy. Same idea here.
#13 — MK-677 (F)
Hear me out. I know people love MK-677, but I'm not a fan.
It causes unpredictable GH secretion patterns, which leads to inconsistent results. It causes significant water retention that masks fat loss. It elevates cortisol and prolactin with prolonged use.
The killer for me is the appetite increase. It's so dramatic that it works against any fat loss goals. Try finding someone who's been on MK-677 consistently for years. You probably won't.
The only real use case is as an appetite stimulant, since it's a ghrelin agonist. But even there, I think GHRP-2 or GHRP-6 does the job better.
#12 — Sermorelin (D)
Sermorelin was one of the first growth hormone peptides on the market, and it's just outdated at this point.
Short half-life. Limited sustained GH pulses. Less effective than newer peptides like tesamorelin or CJC-1295. Modest GH release with limited IGF-1 elevation.
The reason it's still around is that it's FDA approved, so doctors can prescribe it without operating in the research peptide space. Is it better than nothing? Sure. But come on. We have fiber optic internet now. Why are we still using dial-up?
#11 — GHRP-2 and GHRP-6 (C-)
I lumped these together because they're similar. Both have a potent GH release, but they jack up prolactin and cortisol like MK-677. They cause intense, ravenous hunger. They desensitize quickly with continued use.
Here's where they earn the C-. If you struggle to eat enough protein, especially women trying to hit 100-130 grams a day, these can actually help. Better than MK-677 for that purpose because the appetite spike is short.
I've also joked about using these on a GLP-1 day when you have a big family meal coming up. Not officially recommending it. Just saying.
#10 — CJC-1295 with DAC (C)
The DAC (drug affinity complex) extends the half-life dramatically. The problem is that long half-life amplifies all the downsides of elevated GH.
Water retention, fatigue, edema, tingling in your hands. Take a regular dose, get a side effect, and now you're stuck with it for four or five days. You can't easily titrate up or down.
Constant receptor stimulation also blunts your natural GH rhythm. There are just better options for getting physiologic pulses.
#9 — Hexarelin (C+)
On paper, hexarelin has huge GH release potential. In practice, it raises prolactin and cortisol significantly, and you build a tolerance fast. Maybe four weeks max before it stops working.
The use case is short-term injury recovery. If you need a strong GH pulse for a few weeks to help heal something, hexarelin can outperform ipamorelin in that window.
#8 — CJC-1295 No DAC (B-)
Much better than the DAC version. Shorter half-life means natural GH pulses and far lower desensitization risk. Works great paired with ipamorelin.
The catch is that maybe 10-25% of people get bad reactions to CJC even without DAC. Flushing, increased heart rate. If you're using it in isolation, the side effects tend to be worse than when it's blended.
#7 — IGF-1 LR3 (B-)
I love IGF-1 LR3, but it has limitations.
It directly promotes muscle growth, improves recovery, and pairs well with HGH. The LR3 modification extends the half-life so you get sustained IGF-1 elevation.
Downsides are insulin sensitivity issues (I carry gummies if I dose 100 mcg pre-workout) and rapid downregulation. After three to four weeks, the effects drop off significantly relative to the dose. This one is for advanced users only. If you're new to peptides, skip it.
#6 — CJC-1295 No DAC + Ipamorelin Blend (B)
The blend enhances both amplitude and frequency of GH pulses. Synergistic effects on fat loss and recovery. Lower side effect profile than CJC alone. Mimics natural GH cycling well.
A lot of women love this stack. Men do well with it too.
#5 — Ipamorelin Alone (B+)
I rate ipamorelin solo higher than the blend, and here's why.
It's the cleanest GH release out there. Minimal impact on prolactin and cortisol. Almost no side effects. Suitable for long-term use without desensitization.
I've coached so many people who tried CJC + ipamorelin first, had a bad reaction, and swore off peptides. If they'd started with ipamorelin alone, they'd realize the flushing and heart rate stuff comes from the CJC, not the ipamorelin.
It also stacks beautifully. Ipamorelin with BPC-157, TB-500, and GHK is the Wolverine stack for healing and recovery. High quality ipamorelin is one of the best risk-to-reward peptides in the entire space.
#4 — Non-Pharma HGH (B+)
Generic or underground HGH delivers direct, predictable results at a fraction of pharma cost. That's the upside.
The downside is variable quality and purity, which means a higher side effect profile at higher doses. At 2 IU, you probably won't notice much difference between pharma and non-pharma. At 4, 6, or 8 IU, the difference is real. More water retention, more tingling, more daytime sleepiness.
Still better than most peptide options on this list.
#3 — Tesamorelin + Ipamorelin Blend (A-)
This combines tesamorelin's fat-burning effects with ipamorelin's clean GH release. Excellent safety profile. Flexible dosing.
If you're trying to build muscle, especially as a woman, you'll get more out of this blend than ipamorelin alone. Some women do get water retention from tesamorelin since it's strong, so it depends on how your body responds.
Solid muscle building stack. Proven for visceral fat loss and muscle retention.
#2 — Tesamorelin (A)
Tesamorelin is unparalleled for reducing visceral fat, particularly lower abdominal fat. Nothing else on this list touches it for that purpose.
Strong GH and IGF-1 boost without overstimulation. FDA approved under the brand name Egrifta. Originally developed for HIV-induced lipodystrophy, where patients accumulated visceral fat from immune dysfunction.
Visceral fat is one of the worst things you can carry. Tesamorelin handles it better than anything else in the peptide world. Highly effective for fat loss, muscle preservation, and anti-aging.
#1 — Pharma Grade HGH (A+)
The gold standard. My preference is Genotropin from Pfizer, but Norditropin is great too.
Consistent, reliable, clinically tested, FDA approved. We have more data on HGH across different populations than on any of the other compounds on this list. Predictable outcomes for fat loss, muscle gain, and overall health. Superior purity and quality versus non-pharma.
If you're smart and plugged into the right ecosystem, you know where to get it. For any goal, whether bodybuilding, fat loss, or anti-aging, pharma grade HGH is the top of the mountain.
My take
If you're new to growth hormone peptides, start with ipamorelin alone or a tesamorelin + ipamorelin blend. Skip MK-677 and sermorelin. They're outdated.
If you want maximum results and have access, pharma grade HGH is unmatched. Tesamorelin is the closest peptide alternative for visceral fat specifically.
This is just my opinion based on what I've seen across thousands of people I've coached. If you've had great results with something I rated low, don't write it off based on my list. Use cases matter. But pound for pound, this is how I'd rank them.
Full transcript click any paragraph to jump video
Hey everybody, this is Hunter Williams. I hope you were doing amazing wherever you're at in the world. So today's video, I might get some feedback from this one. Today I'm doing a growth hormone tier list video. Many requests to do tierless videos and I just never really got around to it. The reason I was inspired by Bigger Steve on his channel did a couple of tier lists. And I said, yeah, I think it'd be cool to do one just with my own opinion of different areas of performance enhancement,
longevity, anti-aging application. So we'll see how this one goes. I do want to preface this to just say that this is my opinion, my informed opinion after coaching thousands of people just out there on the internet and everything. Based on what I've seen, and I do want to preface this in saying that I welcome your feedback. I Welcome your critical feedback So I'm not immune to criticism nor do I think I should be and i actually receive criticism Very openly because I Think
it makes me better at what i do and ultimately this is just about being The best for you guys because i want, to have the best information to help make the, best change in your life But that being said, understand when I'm going to be rating some of these compounds, I am rating them for what they are intended to do, which is increase growth hormone, to build muscle, burn fat, help us look younger, look healthier, and all those things. So understand if I give something a bad grade, it's relative to what other categories of the compound are in this class. I want to make that clear.
Whether you agree with me or disagree with, me understand that I rate it for it does based on the available things out there. Thank you. The best example that I thought of, and I've thought about this a lot of how to frame this, is that if I give something an F, understand I'm giving it an f relative to other things that raise growth hormone, or improve growth hormones in the body, not relative things to that don't do that. So what I mean is, for instance, if you were to rate a Hyundai car versus a Ferrari, you would give a Honda an s.
But if your getting rated a car in general transportation terms, to like a scooter, you'd give a Hyundai an A plus. And so when I rate things, understand that I'm rating them for their class, meaning that like I rating cars, I would rate a Honda like D or an F and a Ferrari like an a, because on the spectrum of how cars exist, that's what we're comparing them to. But if I were comparing Hyundai to just any form of transportation, well, if the answer is a horse and buggy, am I gonna get a honda like in a plus because it's way better than having to take a horses and buggies somewhere.
So hopefully that makes sense to understand When I'm reading these, I am reading them for the category of compounds that they exist within. And so if I give something a D or an F, understand that there's probably still a use case for it, maybe, and you'll see what I talking about. But understand it like there is way, way better things that are out there. that gives the intended effects without some of the downsides. So that's the whole purpose of this is kind of give you a broad spectrum of what's out there to improve growth hormone and then kind what the gold standard is versus like some the other things.
Again, I welcome your feedback and if you have good experiences with some these compounds at a rate low, understand that it's in the context of that. Hopefully, that makes sense. But before I jump into this, if want to learn how to use some growth-hormone peptides, check out the Peptide Cheat Sheet. That link will be down in description. I'll sign you up for the email list. And then also too, if you want to join the best community of biohacking on the planet, where we talk about peptides, hormone optimization, all that good stuff. And we have AMAs every single Tuesday night for an hour and a half or longer.
If you like the AMA style videos that Jay and I do on Sunday nights, definitely check out fullyoptimizedhealth.com. So without further ado, I'm going to share my screen. Today we are going do the long awaited growth hormone tier list. Alright, I am Hunter Williams and this is the growth hormone tier list and in all reality, it's just my unprofessional opinion because I'm not a doctor or licensed medical professional. Okay, so let's get it out of the way. I have 13 compounds and I'll go in order of last to release the greatest.
I put MK 677 as an F. So hear me out, I know there's a lot of people that love MK out there. I don't, am not a fan, and here's why. One, we have unpredictable GH secretion patterns, which lead to inconsistent results. And I will challenge anyone out to find someone that's been using this for years at a time, because they're probably not gonna do it because of what happened. When it causes significant water retention, it can mask some of the fat loss that increasing growth hormone will do. Um, I think the killer for this one and why I rate his death is it just increases appetite drastically, often so much so that it kind of like,
it's kind productive in any fat loss. Um. And then it also elevates cortisol and prolactin levels with prolonged use. Again, this is why, say I challenge anyone to be out there that's been on it consistently for a long time. Uh, and then, you know, the reason I this, one is even popular to begin with is because of the oral delivery. convenient, but it is obviously a little less reliable injection option. So I know I'll probably take some flack for this and that's totally okay. I'm just not a fan. And I would say if there is a use case for it, it can be as an appetite stimulant.
Um, I believe if I am going from memory correctly, that it's a ghrelin agonist, which basically just means it increases ghrelin in the body. Which is why it causes you to be hungry. And hey, it will get your IGF levels up. It will help you eat more food. it'll make you look bigger. But in terms of like getting what we want out of growth hormone, which is increased muscle mass, less fat, better hair, a better skin, and better nails, I'm just going to rate it an F. So that's my verdict on MK677. I've been asked to do a lot of videos on that.
That's why I haven't done a comprehensive one because it just doesn't really excite me and I don't think it's good. Next one, probably breaking some parts here, but Sarah Morellen, I'm going to rate Sarah morellen as a D. Um, and here's why is because Sarah was actually like one of the first growth hormone peptides that came along and it just is kind of worthless. So, um, there's a certain, uh, professor out there. I guess if you could call him that, that likes to promote this podcast. But the reason he probably does and in his defense is because it is FDA approved.
So a lot of doctors can write prescriptions for this and you're not in the wild, wild west of research peptides. But here's why, so it's a short half-life, it limits the stained GH pulses, and it is less effective than some of the newer peptides like testosterone or CJC1295, but actually like raising growth hormone systemically in the body. It does require frequent injections, which isn't always a bad thing, just reduces user compliance. So it has a modest GH release and limited IGF1 elevation. And again, is just outdated.
you know, if you were using broadband internet, we have fiber optic internet now. So there's just better things out there. Again, is it better than nothing? Sure. Like, Is it Better than just taking creatine? Of course it is. But Sarah Morellen, come on guys, it's kind of worthless, which being involved in the peptide research space. It's always fascinating to me to see like what I know or what think I know about how things work. And then also what people buy and people by Sarah Morel and like a lot of people like Sarah Moron.
Now, is that because of some of these other people that talk about it? Maybe. Or maybe it's being bought by doctors and they're giving to their patients. So I just rate Sarah morel in a D. The next one, I kind of lumped these two together because they're very similar, not identical. GHRP2 and GHRP6, and I'm going to rate them a C minus. And I'll talk about why I didn't, we're not going write them like super low, because I do have like a use case. So they have a potent GH release, but they also increase prolactin and cortisol like MK677. They both cause intense hunger, making it unsuitable for cutting phases or fat loss because, they just cause you to be ravenously hungry for a very short
period of time. Another thing about these, and you kind of see this as we like move our way up, they have rapid desensitization or cellular attenuation with continued use. So there's obviously some other ones that don't have that rapid attinuation that we're going to talk about later. And there are more side effects than the high rank peptides. I think that's because of the nature of GH release of being like super potent. For instance, if you needed to stimulate your appetite. So I know a lot of women, men don't tend to struggle with as much.
They just can't eat for whatever reason. A lot times because of stress, they're hormonally deficient and they don' have digestive enzymes in their stomach to be able to break down food. And so they want to eat. You know, you've got a nervous stomach, their anxious. This can increase appetite to where you like you're getting them to protein. And so many women struggle to get, you know, 100, 120, 130 grams of protein in per day. So I will say like, if that's something you struggle with, this is actually like a pretty cool peptide to do like boom, like increased appetite. And I think it's better to that with this than it would be MK 677. So a lot of the people that say like, Oh, I use MK six seven seven because it increases
my appetite. I think you're actually better off using GHRB two or GHRP six to do so. And then also too, if you are someone that loves eating and you really want to have an appetite for a meal, maybe you run a G I've kind of like joked about this before. Let's say you're taking a GOP-1 peptide and you know you gonna have like a big meal with your family or something that you want to enjoy. Cause a lot of times the GOPs ones like the downsides, it takes out the joy out of eating like big feast meal, with family, or whoever that your hanging your friends, whoever you are hanging out with.
You take a GHRP2, GHRP6 and then boom you hungry for a few hours and go to town. Not recommending that, but hey it's just something I thought about doing, knowing what I know about it. Moving along, coming in at number 10, I have CJC1295 with DAC, so I've made a video explaining the difference. I'll review that a little bit. reduces pulsatility leading to desensitization.
So basically it has a long half-life. Basically with DAC means that there's a thing attached to the CJC called drug affinity complex and extends the half life of the drug and how it's metabolized in the body. Um, so the long, halflife increases the risk of water retention fatigue. If you took all the bad side effects that come from having growth hormone on the, um, which are not necessarily bad because growth, hormone pulses, and we extended those out. it makes it bad. So what I mean by that is like if you get water retention, if get extra fatigue, If you, get edema, tingling in your hands and fingers.
If, you take DAC, that kind of like goes over a period of time. In the anabolic steroid world, this would be like taking something with like a super long ester, like DECA. But if, give bad side effects from it takes like long time for it to go away. Now CJC with DAC is not the same as Deka, but I'm using that as an example. Also to constant receptor stimulation may hinder our natural GH rhythm. There's less flexibility in dosing compared to no DAC, so it's harder to play around with dosings because of this.
Because if you do one dose, then you're kind of like four or five days after you like dealing with side effects, you don't know the titrate up or titrait down. And again, there's just better options that exist for achieving physiologic GH pulses to which we are going to get into. The next one I rated this as a C plus is hexarelin. So coming in at nine, we have hexarelin. Now a lot of people like hexa relics on paper is supposed to like actually like have like a huge growth hormone release potential. But in doing so significantly raises pro-lactin cortisol.
And again, I'm not saying you can't get good results from hexarilin, but again we're looking at some of these trade-offs here. Um, and also to the big bug with hexeriline is that you will build up a tolerance to it pretty fast. So we get rapid desensitization, limits the ability to use it really for longer than like four weeks at a time. I would say maybe even shorter. It's more potent for muscle recovery than GHRP-2 or 6. Again, if you're using it specifically for recovery, you can use for a short term and get a good effect.
So maybe if your like healing an injury, hexarelin might be good to raise growth hormones systemically for short period of time pretty high to help with the injury and you may get more of like a pulse out of it than ipamerelin or something. So slightly more effective than some of the other ones we talked about, but still has notable drawbacks. Moving along to number eight, I have CJC 1295, no DAC. So I rated this as a B minus. And hear me out because I know there's a lot of people love it, it allows for natural GH pulses due to its shorter half-life and there is a much lower
risk of desensitization compared to the DAC version. It works synergistically with other secretagogues like Ipamerelin. It has minimal side effects, making it user friendly. And it's ideal for sustained, but not natural GH support. And also too, um, people tend to have like maybe 10 to 25% of people that I've heard of, they have, like bad reactions to CJC, even CJ C no deck. They'll get like flushing increased heart rate. Um, and I would say like, if you're using it in isolation, there's a higher chance you will have worse side effects.
If you were one of those people to had bad side-effects, it could still be good. But as you are going to see, we're going pair it with it. And I'll talk about that and rate it higher when it's in the presence of it from Roland than just by itself. Coming in at number seven is IGF-1-LR3, and I debated whether I should put this in here, but it is like technically IG-F, so it's, you know, kind of lumped in. Again, all these are about use cases. I love IGf-LR3 or IG1LR-3.
but it does have some limitations. So it directly promotes muscle growth by extending IGF-1's anabolic effects, improved recovery time after intense workouts. IG-F1-LR3, that's where the LR3 comes from. It basically like extends the half-life. Um, so it raises IGf for over a longer period of time, which provides the same benefits. And it synergizes with human growth hormone to amplify muscle building and fat loss. I actually like using IG f alongside of growth hormonal. It does have moderate side effects and potential for insulin sensitivity issues.
So like sometimes if you're the gym, for instance, like if I inject 100 micrograms of IGF before I go train, there's a potential I've kind of felt that before and I carry some gummies with me to do so and it's kind dose dependent. Also the other limitation in my experience of IGF is like after three or four weeks, the effects really tend to go down relative to the dose. And I have gone like two, three hundred micrograms um, before and that works really well. Um, you know, increases definitely, I would say if it like increases fat loss while also building muscle, but it just tends to down regulate pretty fast
and like four to six weeks. So I love IGF one. There's just some limitations relative like to what else we have out there. Again, it's not for everyone. And I will say this is like much more of like an advanced user compound. If you're not well experienced with peptides, definitely just don't go to IG F one use some of these other ones we're going to talk about. And some these ones that I would say are rated higher. So number six, I have rated as a B is CJC 1295 Nodac with Ipamrelin in a blend. Um, so the reason I read this as B and the region I wrote this over just CJ C by itself, um, is that they enhance both amplitude and frequency of GH pulses.
So their synergistic effects to optimize fat loss and recovery. It also reduces the risk of side effects compared to just CJC by itself. So it's like typically if people react badly to CJ C, no DAC, they're going to react a little bit less badly than they would if it was just by themselves. Um, so it allows for flexible dosing that mimics much more closely to like the natural GH cycle that we have. And it does really well for anti-aging and athletic performance. So I'm going to rate this a B. It works really. Well, a lot of women love this one. Men do well with it too.
Next one, I am going rate Ipamerelin by itself a b plus. And here's why I would give it a little bit of a leg up on the blend with CJC is that it's very clean. There's a clean GH release with minimal impact on prolactin and cortisol. It has a much lower side effect profile compared to other security grogs. And I'll say this because I've coached so many people. I have seen so may people give me feedback. A lot of people will take CJC Nodak with Ipamerelin and they get a bad reaction. They're like, oh, I can't do anymore.
Rightfully so. If that's your experience, you're not going to want to use either of those. But if a lot of people started with ipamerelin by itself, they would realize there's like almost no side effect of like the flushing, the heart rate increase that they get from the CJC. And so this is why I like ipamerelin better than the blend. I liked it better by myself because it's very clean and it was very like, if there was one peptide that has like pretty good benefits or really good benefit to like no sides effects, I would say it is ipamarelin. is suitable for long-term use without desensitization.
It's effective for recovery, fat loss, muscle growth, hair, skin, nails. Women love Ipamerelin. And it pairs well with other peptides for enhanced benefit. So, like, if you take Ippamerelin, you put it with BPC, TB500, and GHK, that's like the Wolverine stack. it helps with healing and recovery and everything, a decrease in inflammation. So I think if you get good ipamaryllin, like high quality ipumaryllan, you can really like start to build these stacks where you're like stacking peptides and you really not getting like any side effects.
Whereas like sometimes, people get side-effects and they get weirded out and then they don't want to use other peptide. So it's just one of those ones like I would put it in that upper tier and that's why I give it a B+. Now some people want to like, I'm sure this one is going to get some, some backlash and I've used this not because I had to, but just because like I really wanted to see, um, not for extended periods of time, But I'd used it just to compare it to other ones. And I'll put at number four, non Pharma HGH.
Um, so I might give that one a B plus. So obviously HGH is gonna be the gold standard. The non pharma is basically like you know, generic or underground, whatever you want to call it. But there's a direct GH delivery, which ensures strong, predictable results. And it's more affordable than pharma grade HGH which increases, you know, people's ability to access it and the reason it is not where HCH is going to land is because the quality and purity vary. which raises potential safety concerns, and not even so much safety concern, but the side effect profile is higher.
Relative to Pharma HGH, you're going to have a little bit more water retention, a lot bit potential for tingling in your hands, maybe a bit a more sleepiest during the day. It's still highly effective for those unable to access Pharmagrid HHH, But there are the risk of impurities, it might not be the impurity, just that the Pharma grade HGH has such a good quality control about it that you can run higher doses without the negative effects. So like for two I use of HCH, I don't think you're going to really notice that much of a difference between pharma and non-pharma.
At least I haven't, but when you talk about like four or six, eight I used, you really noticed a different in the pharmer versus the nonpharma. I'm gonna rate it a B plus because I do think like if I had my choice, of like non pharm HGH versus like I'm going to put it right there with it in terms of what I can get. Different use case, I would say, but I still think it would be better than many of the other options we have. All right, so coming in at number three, I have a Testimonelline-Ipimronellin blend.
So I'm going to rate this an A-. And here's why. It combines TestiMonellan's Fabricating effects with Ipumronellan Clean GH Release. so it maximizes body composition and recovery benefits. it's got an excellent safety profile, again, with minimal side effects. You can really have flexible dosing protocol. A lot of women, if you're trying to build muscle, you'll probably get more out of a blend of tessameral and imprimeralin than just impimeral in itself. Now, a lot of women get a lotta water retention on Testosterone, because it is pretty strong, and they don't like it as much as Impramorelin,
so it kinda depends how you feel. But I would say it's definitely proven to improve visceral fat loss and muscle retention, And I will say this is actually a really good muscle building stack. So if you're trying to put on muscle, you are gonna do so better with Testomerolin and Impromorellin in a blend than you would with Imparamorlin. And so again, it goes back to use case. I think pound for pound, I'm gonna rate Testomerellins and as a blend higher than I would just implement. So getting close, moving up to two, I've got testosterone. I'm going to write testosterone as an A.
It's a superior GHRH for reducing visceral fat, particularly abdominal fat. This is what I want to rate it an a one because it's really good. You do get a little bit of water retention relative to the dose, but for its ability to burn lower belly fat it is unparalleled. Um, none of the other ones on here are going to burn lower belly fat. And I think if you look at what most people struggle with in the whole reason we're attacking the growth hormone pathway to begin with burning fat, and then I, think for most average people that aren't bodybuilders building muscle after that, um, but it has a strong GH and IGF one boosting effect.
without overstimulation. It's obviously, this one is FDA approved as well. Uh, it's under the name Agrifta. So it was clinically validated for improving metabolic health. There's actually a side note on testosterone. And it developed for guides with HIV or AIDS, um, induced lipodystrophy, which basically means when your immune system tanks, a lot of guys with AIDS tend to get, uh, visceral fat built up around the belly. This helps, keep that off because again, one of the worst things you can do for your body is to allow the bone up visceral fat. but it's highly effective for fat loss, muscle preservation or building, and anti-aging.
So I'm gonna rate Testimone-Linone. And by now, you could probably guess what number one is. Pharma-grade HDH, my particular... preference would be genotropin from Pfizer, but it's basically the gold standard. So it is gold-standard for HGH therapy. It's consistent, it reliable, its clinically tested, FDA approved for safety and efficacy. We have more data on human growth hormone in multitudes of different population groups relative to some of these other peptides.
Its very predictable, Its consistent. The outcomes for fat loss, muscle gain, and overall health are very tried and true. Obviously we have the superior purity and quality compared to non-pharmaguage. And again, it's backed by extensive research and trusted medical professionals. So the gold standard, and if you're smart and you are around the ecosystem, you'll know where to get it. It's pharma grade HGH. I will say that is going to be, for anything that you want to do, whether you like in the bodybuilding crowd and want Uh, whether you want fat loss, you wanna anti-aging, obviously everything's going to be relative to the dose.
And I won't go into that too much on this video, but, um, pharma grade HGH, my preference is genotropin, nortotropin is great. Um, You know, there's, There's a couple other out there too, that are pharmagrade that, I don't need to go into, but it's going to be a plus. So believe it or not for growth hormone purposes. Yes. In my opinion on the tier list growth, hormone itself from a pharmaceutical source is an a-plus. That is it for the slides. And that is the growth hormone tier list.
So hopefully this was entertaining and educational all at the same time. I look forward to hearing your feedback or just your opinions on this, because I'm sure there's some that I rated pretty low that people have gotten good results from. Again, I wasn't here to attack that, but if we're looking at that whole spectrum, pharmaceutical grade, gene atropin, nortotropins versus MK677, how do those, everything, those and everything in between stack up? That's my opinion. So, um, hopefully I was helping you guys. And if you've not tried some of these, I haven't recommended everyone like do their own research, meaning that like, you know,
if there's some out there that you like just cause I gave it a bad grade, don't necessarily write it off because like I said, there are use cases. Then we talked about that. Some of those of what they do. Um, with this one, uh, you know, hopefully this video does well. I would love and welcome your feedback. Um. And again, there are no bad comments, unless obviously you're just being rude and mean to people. But, um, I welcome, any criticism, cause I'd love to hear your. Feedback. Again, this is just going off of what I've seen in my own life and, thousands of people I have coached. So hopefully, This will be helpful. Hopefully as you are going into 2025, and you, are looking to improve growth hormone, which I think everyone should be looking at doing,
especially after the age of 30, 35. Hopefully this is helpful in guiding you along your journey. So I appreciate you guys. Thank you so much. You know, at the end of the video, every video I try to just let you know how thankful and grateful I am that I get to do this because it's a dream come true to me. I love what I do.
